Large employers are rethinking their retiree healthcare strategy as a result of federal healthcare reform, according to Aon Hewitt, a global human resource consulting and outsourcing business of Aon Corporation.
The Lincolnshire, Ill.-based firm surveyed 344 companies, representing 2.2 million retirees nationwide, last year and found that 61 percent were either already evaluating or were expected to evaluate their long-term retiree medical strategy by the end of 2011 due to healthcare reform. Meanwhile, 23 percent of respondents indicated they were still considering whether to assess their strategy and only 16 percent had no immediate plans to review their approach.
"Healthcare reform creates both challenges and opportunities for employers sponsoring retiree medical programs," said John Grosso, a retiree healthcare group leader with Aon Hewitt. "Most employers have been studying the new legislation to understand how to effectively manage the challenges, while taking full advantage of the new opportunities going forward. Many will find that the new legislation will create significant and immediate savings opportunities."
[See related story: Retiree healthcare cost survey shows affordability and access concerns]
Among those planning to apply for the temporary Early Retiree Reinsurance Program (ERRP) to help offset a portion of the cost of health claims for retirees age 55 to 64, 48 percent anticipate using the proceeds to reduce premiums, including both employer and participant share, while 21 percent intend to reduce the employer share of premiums only.
As for those who pay a portion of health coverage for their retirees age 65 or older, three-quarters currently collect the Retiree Drug Subsidy (RDS). Of those, 73 percent said they are altering their retiree drug benefits strategy, as health reform eliminates the RDS tax advantages for 2013 and creates enhancements to the Medicare Part D program for retiree drug benefits beginning in 2011. In fact, 61 percent anticipate announcing these changes by the end of 2011 in order to begin recognizing accounting savings quickly, while 86 percent expect to implement these changes by 2013.
Alternatives most favored by employers making or contemplating changes to their post-65 retiree medical programs include contracting with a Part D Prescription Drug Plan (34 percent) or moving to a pure defined contribution approach (30 percent) where post-65 retirees can purchase benefits through the individual Medicare retiree plan market. Other employers that anticipate leveraging an expanded market for Medicare retiree prescription drug plans support combining access to individual Part D plans with premium subsidization (5 percent) or out-of-pocket cost subsidization (5 percent). Another 9 percent prefer eliminating employer-sponsored retiree prescription drug benefits altogether.
Of the employers favoring contracting with a Part D Prescription Drug Plan on a group basis, 57 percent will look to use an "Employer Group Waiver Plan (EGWP) + Wrap" approach, whereby the employer contracts for a Standard Medicare Part D plan design with a wraparound benefit that attempts to preserve the current prescription drug plan design and formulary strategy for the retiree.
"Many employers are looking to access cost-reduction opportunities created by the new changes to the Part D program," said Grosso. "For those wanting to continue to manage and control their group program, contracting with a Medicare Part D plan on a group basis, leveraging the EGWP process, will make sense. Conversely, for those looking to move away from a group-based model, individual market-based benefit sourcing, supported by some level of tax-effective defined contribution funding, may be a desirable strategy."
Aon Hewitt's survey also found that 36 percent of respondents plan to make changes to their pre-65 retiree benefits strategy to leverage the health insurance exchanges that states or the federal government are required to create by 2014. What's more, 21 percent prefer moving to a pure defined contribution approach, where retirees could use an account established by the employer to purchase coverage through the exchanges. The balance of these employers anticipate eliminating pre-65 coverage in response to the creation of exchanges.
"It is clear that a growing number of companies realize now is the time to take a closer look at their retiree medical strategies in an effort to leverage key cost and risk management opportunities created by reform," said Milind Desai, a retirement actuary with Aon Hewitt. "Individual market benefit-sourcing, supported by state and private exchanges, can create cost-effective coverage opportunities for retirees that do not exist today, even within most employer-sponsored retiree group health plans. This is a primary reason why employer programs will evolve toward individual market-based benefit strategies over time."