Contributed By Thomas R. Green
THIS FALL, Standard & Poor’s issued a report expressing concern over the credit risks of not-for-profit healthcare providers with speculative-grade ratings. While few small hospitals carry credit ratings, many would be considered speculative-grade (BB+ or lower) if they did.
The overall commentary on these perceived risk serves as a reminder of the importance of understanding a hospital’s complete credit profile.
S&P states in September’s “U.S. Not-for-Profit Health Care 2007 Speculative-Grade Medians” that because of “worsening conditions in the acute-care sector in 2008 and beyond, it will be difficult for many speculative-grade credits to improve their operations and balance sheets, invest in plant, and recruit physicians.”
But renovations and replacements can be financed if a hospital does a thorough evaluation of its strengths and weaknesses, understands available financial structures, and monitors markets to ensure it is creating an optimal capital structure.
Know Your Hospital
Hospitals must evaluate their strategic plans and their funding needs in tandem to accurately determine their best financial options. The first steps toward acquiring funding of any kind are performing an assessment to determine needs and evaluating credit strengths.
A hospital’s credit strength or financial health is the single most important factor in determining its cost of capital. Comprehensive explanation of the credit profile can help creditors understand a hospital’s risk level more accurately and alleviate their concerns. Any strategies to improve the hospital’s financial health should be noted clearly, including strategic focus on operational improvements, or a focus on outpatient services if a market demands it.
Investors and credit enhancement providers will review quantitative and qualitative factors to measure credit strength. Quantitative factors define a hospital’s ability to repay debt; they place the hospital in a broad credit range. Qualitative factors determine long-term financial viability and refine the hospital’s position within a credit range.
Know Your Options
S&P notes that financial ratios, such as days cash on hand, debt to capitalization and cash to debt, for speculative-grade not-for-profit healthcare providers have increased slightly. This means some hospitals may not be taking on additional debt to continue to improve because they have limited access to capital.
Community and rural facilities, as a lower-credit group, do have fewer options. S&P states that these facilities may have to rely on “more expensive or more restrictive financing, including FHA insurance” and bank loans.
However, additional options can be affordable even for weaker credits. These can be tailored to smaller facilities, and offer considerable benefits, such as long amortizations and financial flexibility. Letters of credit, U.S. Department of Agriculture loans and Federal Housing Administration mortgage insurance are generally available. Also, unenhanced bonds and even bond insurance can be viable options for speculative-grade credits in the current market.
Unenhanced Bonds
Unenhanced (rated or unrated) revenue bonds sold on the credit profile of the borrower have become more widely accepted by investors, although unrated offerings face a more limited market. They are supported solely by the borrower’s credit characteristics – the bonds will tend to trade at a broader range of interest rates depending on the market’s perception of risk at the time of the sale. Unenhanced bonds typically are structures as fixed-rate serial and term maturities with a final amortization of 25 to 30 years from the date of issuance. They normally prohibit prepayment for 10 years.
Healthcare borrowers generally pay a premium over other borrowers when issuing bonds, known as a credit spread. Credit spreads started widening in 1999 and remained wide until mid-2006, when they narrowed sharply. This narrowing brought the cost of fixed-rate borrowing for a small hospital with the equivalent of a BBB rating closer to that of an A-rated facility. In late summer 2007, spreads began widening again, and constant monitoring of the markets is necessary to ensure the most efficient borrowing option is chosen.
Letters of Credit
Letters of credit are enhancements purchased from a rated bank by a borrowing hospital. They enable the hospital to issue bonds at the bank’s credit strength, thus providing a lower interest rate and lower cost of capital. Letters of credit can provide more flexibility than many other options, but banks can be hesitant to extend credit. A bank could refuse to issue a letter of credit for a viable hospital project if it lacked a branch near the hospital, if the credit request was too large, or if the bank was unfamiliar with the hospital’s operations.
Letters of credit carry renewal risk, as most are issued for three- to five-year terms, much less time than the full bond amortization. These renewals can serve as opportunities to negotiate a better rate for the borrower or less restrictive terms if the hospital’s credit improves. Letters of credit also offer more flexibility than many options because the debt can be paid off whenever the borrower desires, without penalty.
FHA Mortgage Insurance
The use of FHA Section 242 mortgage insurance has been expanding across the country. The program’s total portfolio remains small – nine new loans were closed in 2006 – but its benefits are considerable.
The program enables borrowers to issue bonds at an AAA-equivalent rating. Interest rates are fixed, which can be very appealing in a low interest rate market. Borrowers have 25 years to pay back FHA mortgage-insured loans, a relatively long amortization that gives hospitals better opportunities to service the debt. No financial guarantees are required by parent or affiliated entities, and a high loan-to-value ratio can minimize up-front cash requirements.
FHA-insured obligations are non-recourse to the borrower, meaning the loans are backed solely by the borrower’s real estate and other assets. For a hospital that is part of a system, this structure provides minimal risk because the parent organization is not liable for the debt of the individual facility being financed.
USDA Community Facilities Program
The USDA offers direct loans, guaranteed loans and grants under its Community Facilities program. They are available only to not-for-profit rural organizations serving communities with fewer than 20,000 residents. The pool of money for direct loans and grants is limited, but the guaranteed loan program historically has not used its total obligation capacity.
A USDA loan can be for as much as 100 percent of the cost of the project, and 90 percent of that loan is guaranteed. While the loan is designed for building new and improving existing facilities, it can be used for refinances under certain conditions. Borrowers have as long as 40 years to pay off the loans. Interest on these loans is taxable, although there has been discussion about guaranteeing tax-exempt loans.
Typical loan amounts under this program have tended to be less than those made under the FHA Section 242 program because funding is limited to the amount appropriated by Congress. There is, however, no maximum loan amount.
Have an Alternative Plan
The financial option that starts as the most efficient may not always remain the best choice, depending on market shifts during financing. Some structures can take longer than others, leaving time for the markets to move. The healthcare credit spread and investor sentiment change constantly, and the benefits of taxable or tax-exempt, unenhanced or enhanced financing options will change, sometimes enough to make switching structures worthwhile.
Further, any change to internal credit profile factors can affect a financing. Banks can change their minds. Know your backup options, and know what it would take to make each of those options your best choice.
Continual reinvestment in a community or rural facility is necessary in a constantly changing healthcare environment. While lower-credit facilities certainly face challenges in accessing capital, programs and options can help them afford to stay modern while protecting their long-term financial health.
Thomas R. Green is chief executive officer of Lancaster Pollard, an investment banking, mortgage banking and financial advisory firm that specializes in financing solutions for rural and community hospitals. Reprinted with permission from The Capital Issue at www.lancasterpollard.com.